Showing posts with label #FEMINISM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #FEMINISM. Show all posts

Monday, October 22, 2012

WOMEN PREACHERS, PASTORS AND BISHOPS


May a Woman Preach or Have Authority in Church?

What role should women have as church leaders? May they be preachers, elders, pastors, bishops, deacons? Must they submit to authority of men, or may the preach and teach with equality?

May women be Bible teachers and preachers? Are women equally as important as men, or do the Scriptures demean women? Should men hold the roles of leadership in the church, such as preachers, pastors, bishops, elders, and deacons? Does the Bible teach women to be subject in submission to the authority of men? Did Paul hate women or teach they should be mistreated? Is the Bible teaching about women's role outdated and antiquated?

Note: This is a brief, summary study. Click here for a detailed in-depth study of this subject.

I. The Value of Women and Their Work.


A. Women's Work Is Equally as Important as Man's.

Women are just as important or valued as men. They are honored and rewarded for their work as highly as men are for their work.
Gal. 3:28; I Pet. 3:7; Prov. 31:10-31

B. God Values People for Their Service, not Their Authority.

Matt. 20:25-28
Note that this does not deny the existence of valid authority. Jesus used Himself as the example, and He possessed authority (Matt. 28:18; 7:29). The point is that possession of authority does not inherently make one great. People without authority can be just as great as those who have it. Cf. citizens to rulers, men to elders, etc.
However, the fact men and women are equally valued does not mean God expects them to do the same work.

C. In Particular, the Woman's Role as Homemaker Is of Great Value

God honors woman in this role, and she ought to be honored by men.
1 Timothy 5:14; Titus 2:5; Psalm 113:9; Proverbs 31:10-31; 7:11,12

D. Women Have a Definite Responsibility in teaching.

They may teach women or children.

Titus 2:3,4; Proverbs 31:1; 1:8; 2 Timothy 1:5

They may even impart truth to men in a limited capacity.

Acts 18:26; 2:17; 21:9; John 4:28-30,39,42
However, note that none of these passages place women as preaching God's word in the public worship assemblies of the whole church or in any capacity which puts them in authority over men.

II. Restrictions on Women in Authority and Teaching


A. Women Are Subject to Men

Many passages teach the subjection of women to men in general.
Genesis 2:18; 3:16; Ephesians 5:22-33; Colossians 3:18; I Corinthians 11:3; 14:34; I Timothy 2:12-14; 3:4,12; Titus 2:4,5; I Peter 3:1-7

B. Positions of Authority & Leadership in the Church Are Reserved for Men.

Jesus, the Head of the church, was a man - Ephesians 1:22,23
Apostles were all men -- Acts 1:13.
Elders, who oversee the local church (Acts 20:28; 1 Peter 5:1-3), must be men -- 1 Timothy 3:1,2; Titus 1:5,6. 
Men did the speaking in all New Testament examples of preaching to church assemblies or leading group studies including men - Acts 2:14-40; 11:25,26; 13:14-41; 20:7; etc.
There is no example anywhere in the New Testament in which a woman preached in any church assembly or led a study in which men were present.

C. Women Are Subject to Men in Spiritual Teaching and Leadership.

Women are expressly forbidden to take a leading role over men in the church or in any circumstance of teaching God's word.

1 Timothy 2:11-14 - Women are subject to men in spiritual teaching situations.

V13,14 give two reasons for women's subjection to man.
V13 - First, man was formed before woman. This refers to the creation account of Gen. 2:18ff. See also 1 Cor. 11:3,8,9.
Woman was created from the beginning to be a helper or companion to man, not a leader or authority figure over him. Man was created with the position of leader and his nature suits that position.
V14 - Man has the leadership role because, though both Adam and Eve sinned, the woman was deceived where man was not. Both man and woman were punished, but God made the punishment fit the sin.
Eve tried to take the leadership role and made a decision to disobey God without consulting her husband. She allowed herself to be deceived and made a colossal blunder, so God required that she would always be subject to her husband (Gen. 3:16). Her punishment reminds her that she left her role of subjection. Man was punished just as severely, but in a different way.

1 Corinthians 14:34,35 - Women are to be silent in the assemblies of the church.

V34 says women must keep silence "in the churches." V35 says it is shameful for them to speak "in the church." The context defines "silence" to mean not speaking, not even to ask a question.
The context shows that "in the church" refers to the public worship assembly in which the church is called together to sing and pray (v15) and be edified (v26). The church is gathered together in congregation as a body. See v23,26 (cf. v4,5,12,19,28,33,34,35). Compare the similar usage in 1 Cor. 11:17-34 regarding the assemblies in which the Lord's supper was offered (cf. v17,18,20,33).

III. Answers To Objections


A. Was Phoebe a Preacher?

Romans 16:2 says Phoebe was a "minister" or "servant." How she served is not defined. There are many different ways people may serve or minister to others.
Cf. John 2:5.
No passage anywhere indicates that any women were appointed to any specific office of work in the church like elders and deacons. Appointment to office requires specific qualifications (Titus 1; 1 Tim. 3). None are ever given for women.
If Phoebe had preached in public church meetings, she would have violated express New Testament commands.

B. Was This Just Paul's Opinion or a Requirement of God?

Some people claim this was just Paul's personal opinion, not Divine regulation
1) It is based on the principle of subjection of women to men. This was a principle established by God and revealed through various inspired teachers, not just Paul. Gen. 2:18; 3:16; Eph. 5:22-33; Col. 3:18; I Cor. 11:3; Tit. 2:4,5; I Pet. 3:1-7; I Cor. 14:34.
2) 1 Cor. 14:34,35 says the same was also taught in the law (Gen. 2:18; 3:16). Hence, it was not just Paul's opinion nor a temporary or local custom but had been the rule even under the Old Testament.
3) 1 Cor. 14:37 expressly states that these teachings were "the commandment of the Lord." Paul was an inspired apostle (2 Cor. 11:5: 12:11,12; 1 Cor. 9:1-5; 15:4-8; Acts 9:15; 26:16). To reject this teaching is to reject the commands of God. See also 1 Thess. 2:13; 4:8; Eph. 3:3-5; Gal. 1:6-12; 1 Cor. 2:1-5,10-16; 2 Peter 3:15,16; Luke 10:16; John 16:13,14; Matt. 18:18;
4) Paul was not prejudiced against women. Much of the teaching about the value of women was done by Paul. See also Eph. 5:25-29,33; Galatians 3:28; Col. 3:19; Acts 16:14,15,40; Rom. 16:1-4,6.

C. Was This a Binding, Permanent Command or Just a Custom of That Day?

Some claim that the teaching about women's subjection was not intended to be permanent but was a local, temporary custom of that day.
1) It is based on the principle of subjection of women to men. This is a universal principle binding on all Christians in the gospel age, taught in other passages including Gen. 2:18; 3:16; Eph. 5:22-33; Col. 3:18; I Cor. 11:3; Tit. 2:4,5; I Pet. 3:1-7; I Cor. 14:34. Note that some of these are taught by inspired men other than Paul.
2) 1 Cor. 14:34,35 says the same was also taught in the law (Gen. 2:18; 3:16). Hence, it was not just a temporary or local custom but had been the rule even under the Old Testament.\
3) V33 says that the things Paul was teaching apply "in all the churches of the saints."
4) Again, 1 Cor. 14:37 expressly states that these teachings were "the commandment of the Lord." Hence, they were not just local, temporary customs. Paul was an inspired apostle. To reject this teaching is to reject the commands of God, not just temporary customs. See passages above.
We must not lightly set aside the teachings of God's word as non-binding customs. Unless there is clear evidence to the contrary, we must accept that which God's word teaches to be Divine command.

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

TEN LIES OF FEMINISM



By : Sue Bohlin


This essay examines the ten lies of feminism that Dr. Toni Grant suggests in her book Being a Woman.(1)
At its inception, the feminist movement, accompanied by the sexual revolution, made a series of enticing, exciting promises to women. These promises sounded good, so good that many women deserted their men and their children or rejected the entire notion of marriage and family, in pursuit of "themselves" and a career. These pursuits, which emphasized self-sufficiency and individualism, were supposed to enhance a woman's quality of life and improve her options, as well as her relations with men. Now, a decade or so later, women have had to face the fact that, in many ways, feminism and liberation made promises that could not be delivered.(2)

Lie #1: Women Can Have It All

The first lie is that women can have it all. We were fed an illusion that women, being the superior sex, have an inexhaustible supply of physical and emotional energy that enable us to juggle a career, family, friendships and volunteer service. Proponents of feminism declared that not only can women do what men do, but we ought to do what men do. Since men can't do what women can do-- have babies--this put a double burden on women. It wasn't enough that women were already exhausted from the never-ending tasks of child-rearing and homemaking; we were told that women needed to be in the work force as well, contributing to the family financially. Scripture presents a different picture for men and women. The Bible appears to make a distinction between each gender's primary energies. The commands to women are generally in the realm of our relationships, which is consistent with the way God made women to be primarily relational, being naturally sensitive to others and usually valuing people above things. Scripture never forbids women to be gainfully employed; in fact, the virtuous woman of Proverbs 31 is engaged in several part-time business ventures, in real estate and manufacturing. Nonetheless, it is the excellent care of her husband, her children, her home and her community that inspires the praise she is due. Titus 2 instructs older women to mentor younger women, and teach them to care for their husbands and children and homemaking responsibilities. The God-given strengths of a woman were given to bring glory to God through her womanly differences

Lie #2: Men and Women are Fundamentally the Same

Apart from some minor biological differences, feminism strongly suggested that males and females are fundamentally the same. Culture, it announced, was responsible for turning human blank slates into truck-wielding boys and doll-toting girls. This lie has been very effective at changing the culture. My husband Ray and I offer a seminar at Probe's Mind Games conferences called "Guys Are From Mars, Girls Are From Venus," where we go over the major differences between the sexes. Men, for instance, tend to be more goal-oriented and competitive, where women are more relational and cooperative. Men are active; women are verbal. This is intuitively obvious to the adults in our audience, but it is often new news to high school and college students. We find adults nodding with smiles of recognition, some of them nudging each other in the ribs. In the younger members of the audience, though, we see "the lights come on" in their eyes as they are exposed to something that is obvious and they probably already knew was true, but feminism's world view had been feeding them a lie. They have been so immersed in this cultural myth that they had accepted it without question. One young man came up to me after a session and said he totally disagreed with me, that there are no real differences between males and females. I asked him if he treated his guy friends the same way he treated his girl friends, and he said, "Of course!" I asked, "And this doesn't cause you any problems?" He said no. With a smile, I suggested he come talk to me in ten years after he'd had a chance to experience real life! The truth is that God created significant differences between males and females. We can see evidence of this in the fact that Scripture gives different commands for husbands and wives, which are rooted in the differing needs and divinely-appointed roles of men and women.

Lie #3: Desirability is Enhanced by Achievement

The third lie of feminism is that the more a woman achieves, the more attractive and desirable she becomes to men. The importance of achievement to a man's sense of self--an element of masculinity that is, we believe, God-given--was projected onto women. Feminism declared that achieving something, making a mark in the world, was the only measure of success that merited the respect of others. Women who believed this myth found themselves competing with men. Now, competition is appropriate in the business and professional world, but it's disastrous in relationships. Men do respect and admire accomplished women, just as they do men, but personal relationships operate under a different set of standards. Men most appreciate a woman's unique feminine attributes: love, sensitivity, her abilities to relate. Women have been shocked to discover that their hard-won accomplishments haven't resulted in great relationships with men. Sometimes, being overeducated hampers a woman's ability to relate to men. Men's egos are notoriously fragile, and they are by nature competitive. It's threatening to many men when a woman achieves more, or accomplishes more, or knows more than they do. Feminism didn't warn women of the double standard in relationships: that achievement can and does reap benefits in our careers, but be a stumbling block in our relationships.
The question naturally arises, then, Is it bad for a woman to have a higher degree of education than the man in a relationship? Is it troublesome when a woman is smarter than the man? Should a woman "dumb down" in order to get or keep her man? In the words of the apostle Paul, "May it never be!" A woman living up to the potential of her God-given gifts brings glory to God; it would be an insult to our gracious God to pretend those gifts aren't there. The answer is for women to understand that many men feel threatened and insecure about this area of potential competition, and maintain an attitude of humility and sensitivity about one's strengths; as Romans exhorts us, "Honor[ing] one another above yourselves" (12:10).
Not surprisingly, God already knew about the disparity between the sexes on the issue of achievement. Throughout the Bible, men are called to trust God as they achieve whatever God has called them to do. It's important for men to experience personal significance by making a mark on the world. But God calls women to trust Him in a different area: in our relationships. A woman's value is usually not in providing history-changing leadership and making great, bold moves, but in loving and supporting those around us, changing the world by touching hearts. Once in a while, a woman does make her mark on a national or global scale: consider the biblical judge Deborah, Golda Meir, Margaret Thatcher, and Indira Ghandi. But women like these are the exception, not the rule. And we don't have to feel guilty for not being "exceptional."

Lie #4: The Myth of One's "Unrealized Potential"

Lie number four says that all of us--but especially women--have tremendous potential that simply must be realized. To feminism's way of thinking, just being average isn't acceptable: you must be great. This causes two problems. First, women are deceived into thinking they are one of the elite, the few, the special. Reality, though, is that most women are ordinary, one of the many. All of us are uniquely gifted by God, but few women are given visible, high- profile leadership roles, which tend to be the only ones that feminism deems valuable. We run into trouble when we're operating under a set of beliefs that don't coincide with reality!
Consequently, many women are operating under unrealistically high expectations of themselves. When life doesn't deliver on their hopes, whether they be making class valedictorian, beauty pageant winner, company president, or neurosurgeon, women are set up for major disappointment. Just being a cog in the wheel of your own small world isn't enough.
This brings us to the second problem. A lot of women beat themselves up for not accomplishing greatness. Instead of investing their life's energies in doing well those things they can do, they grieve what and who they are not. Just being good, or being good at what they do, isn't enough if they're not the best.
Romans 12:3 tells us, "Do not think of yourself more highly than you ought." Rather than worrying about our unrealized potential for some sort of nebulous greatness, we ought to be concerned about being faithful and obedient in the things God has given us to do, trusting Him for the ultimate results. And we ought to not worry about being ordinary as if there were some stigma to it. Scripture says that God is pleased to use ordinary people, because that's how He gets the most glory. (See 1 Corinthians 1:26-31.) There is honor in being an ordinary person in the hand of an extraordinary God.

Lie #5: Sexual Sameness

The fifth lie of feminism is that men and women are the same sexually. This lie comes to us courtesy of the same evil source that brought us the lies of the sexual revolution. The truth is that women can't separate sex from love as easily as men can. For women, sex needs to be an expression of love and commitment. Without these qualities, sex is demeaning, nothing more than hormones going crazy.
The cost of sex is far greater for women than for men. Sex outside of a committed, loving relationship--I'm talking about marriage here--often results in unplanned pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases, and profound heartbreak. Every time a woman gives her body away to a man, she gives a part of her heart as well. Sexual "freedom" has brought new degrees of heartache to millions of women. The lie of sexual equality has produced widespread promiscuity and epidemic disease. No wonder so many women are struggling with self-esteem!
God's commands concerning sex take into account the fact that men and women are not the same sexually or any other way. He tells us to exercise self-control before marriage, saving all sexual expression for the constraints of a marriage relationship, and then to keep the marriage bed pure once we are married. When we follow these guidelines, we discover that God's laws provide protection for women: the security of a committed relationship, freedom from sexual health worries, and a stable environment for any children produced in the union. This high standard also protects men by providing a safe channel for their sexual energies. Both chaste single men, and faithful husbands, are kept safe from sexual diseases, unwanted pregnancies with women other than their wives, and the guilt of sexual sin.

Lie #6: The Denial of Maternity

Many women postponed marriage and childbearing to pursue their own personal development and career goals. This perspective denies the reality of a woman's reproductive system and the limitations of time. Childbearing is easier in a woman's 20s and 30s than in her 40s. Plus, there is a physical cost; science has borne out the liabilities that older women incur for themselves and their babies. Midlife women are more prone to have problems getting pregnant, staying pregnant, and then experiencing difficult deliveries. The risk of conceiving a child with Down's Syndrome is considerably higher in older mothers.(3) Fertility treatment doesn't work as well for women over 40.(4) There is also a spiritual dimension to denying maternity. When women refuse their God-ordained roles and responsibilities, they open themselves to spiritual deception and temptations. 1 Timothy 2:15 is an intriguing verse: "But women will be saved through childbearing." One compelling translation for this verse is, "Women will be kept safe through childbearing," where Paul uses the word for childbearing as a sort of shorthand for the woman's involvement in the domestic sphere--having her "focus on the family," so to speak.(5) When a married woman's priorities are marriage, family and the home, she is kept safe--protected--from the consequences of delaying motherhood and the temptations that beleaguer a woman trying to fill a man's role. For example, I know one married woman who chose to pursue a full-time career in commercial real estate, to the detriment of her family. She confessed that she found herself constantly battling the temptation to lust on two fronts: sexual lust for the men in her office and her clients, and lust for the recognition and material things that marked success in that field. Another friend chose her career over having any children at all, and discovered that like the men in her field, she could not separate her sense of self from her job, and it ultimately cost her her marriage and her life as she knew it. The problem isn't having a career: the problem is when a woman gets her priorities out of balance.

Lie #7: To Be Feminine Is To Be Weak

In the attempt to blur gender distinctions, feminists declared war on the concept of gender-related characteristics. The qualities that marked feminine women--softness, sweetness, kindness, the ability to relate well--were judged as silly, stupid and weak. Only what characterized men--characteristics like firmness, aggressiveness, competitiveness--were deemed valuable. But when women try to take on male qualities, the end result is a distortion that is neither feminine nor masculine. A woman is perceived as shrill, not spirited. What is expected and acceptable aggression in a man is perceived as unwelcome brashness in a woman. When women try to be tough, it is often taken as unpleasantness. Unfortunately, there really is a strong stereotype about "what women should be like" that merits being torn down. A lot of men are threatened by strong women with opinions and agendas of their own, and treat them with undeserved disrespect. But it is not true that traditionally masculine characteristics are the only ones that count.
There really is a double standard operating, because the characteristics that constitute masculinity and femininity are separate and different, and they are not interchangeable. To be feminine is a special kind of strength. It's a different, appealing kind of power that allows a woman to influence her world in a way quite distinct from the way a man influences the world. It pleased the Lord to create woman to complement man, not to compete with him or be a more rounded copy of him. 1 Corinthians 11:7 says that man is the image and glory of God, but woman is the glory of man. Femininity isn't weakness; it's the glorious, splendid crown on humanity.

Lie #8: Doing is Better Than Being

In his book Men Are From Mars, Women Are From Venus(6), John Gray pointed out that men get their sense of self from achievement, and women get their sense of self from relationships. Feminism declared that the male orientation of what you do was the only one that mattered; who you are, and how important you are to the people in your world, didn't count for as much. This lie said that active is good, passive is bad. Traditional feminine behaviors of being passive and receptive were denounced as demeaning to women and ineffective in the world. Only being the initiator counted, not being the responder. "To listen, to be there, to receive the other with an open heart and mind--this has always been one of the most vital roles of woman. Most women do this quite naturally, but many have come to feel uneasy in this role. Instead, they work frantically on assertiveness, aggression, personal expression, and power, madly suppressing their feminine instincts of love and relatedness."(7)
Women's roles in the family, the church, and the world are a combination of being a responder and an initiator. As a responder, a wife honors her husband through loving submission, and a woman serves the church through the exercise of her spiritual gifts. As an initiator and leader, a woman teaches her children and uses her abilities in the world, such as the woman of Proverbs 31. God's plan is for us to live a balanced life--sometimes active, sometimes passive; sometimes the initiator, sometimes the responder; at all times, submitting both who we are and what we do to the Lordship of Christ.

Lie #9: The Myth of Self-Sufficiency

The ninth lie is the myth of self-sufficiency. Remember the famous feminist slogan that appeared on everything from bumper stickers to t-shirts to notepads? "A woman without a man is like a fish without a bicycle." The message was clear: women don't need men, who are inferior anyway. The world would be a better place if women ran it: no wars, no greed, no power plays, just glorious cooperation and peace. The next step after "women don't need men" was logical: women don't need anybody. We can take care of ourselves. Helen Reddy's hit song "I Am Woman" became feminism's theme song, with the memorable chorus, "If I have to, I can do anything / I am strong / I am invincible / I am woman!"
Of course, if women don't need anybody except themselves, they certainly don't need God. Particularly a masculine, patriarchal God who makes rules they don't like and insists that He alone is God. But the need to worship is deeply ingrained in us, so feminist thought gave rise to goddess worship. The goddess was just a female image to focus on; in actuality, goddess worship is worship of oneself.(8)
The lie of self-sufficiency is the same lie that Satan has been deceiving us with since the Garden of Eden: What do you need God for? We grieve the Lord's heart when we believe this lie. Jeremiah 2:13 says, "My people have committed two sins: they have forsaken Me, the spring of living water, and have dug their own cisterns, broken cisterns that cannot hold water." God made us for Himself; believing the lie of self-sufficiency isn't only futile, it's a slap in God's face.

Lie #10: Women Would Enjoy the Feminization of Men

The tenth lie of feminism is that women would enjoy the feminization of men. Feminists believed that the only way to achieve equality of the sexes was to do away with role distinctions. Then they decided that that wasn't enough: society had to do away with gender distinctions, or at the very least blur the lines. Women embraced more masculine values, and men were encouraged to embrace more feminine characteristics. That was supposed to fix the problem. It didn't. As men tried to be "good guys" and accommodate feminists' demands, the culture saw a new type of man emerge: sensitive, nurturing, warmly compassionate, yielding. The only problem was that this "soft man" wasn't what women wanted. Women pushed men to be like women, and when they complied, nobody respected them. Women, it turns out, want to be the soft ones--and we want men to be strong and firm and courageous; we want a manly man. When men start taking on feminine characteristics, they're just wimpy and unmasculine, not pleasing themselves or the women who demanded the change. There is a good reason that books and movies with strong, masculine heroes continue to appeal to such a large audience. Both men and women respond to men who fulfill God's design for male leadership, protection, and strength.
Underlying the women's liberation movement is an angry, unsubmissive attitude that is fueled by the lies of deception. It's good to know what the lies are, but it's also important to know what God's word says, so we can combat the lies with the power of His truth.
Notes
1. Toni Grant, Being a Woman: Fulfilling Your Femininity and Finding Love. New York: Random House, 1988.
2. Grant, 3.
3. Physicians of the Geisinger Health System, "Motherhood at ThirtySomething." http://www.geisinger.edu/ghs/pubtips/m/MotherhoodatThirtySomething.html
4. Denise Mann, "Older Women Rarely Become New Moms With IVF." http://www.ssnewslink.com/demo/womensstudies/19980226A3555.html
5. Andreas Kostenberger, "Saved Through Childbearing?" (CBMW [The Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood] News, Sept. 1997), p. 3.
6. John Gray, Men Are From Mars, Women Are From Venus. New York: HarperCollins, 1992.
7. Grant, 9.
8. Mary Kassian, The Feminist Gospel (Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway Books, 1992), p. 159.
© 1998 Probe Ministries International

About the Author

Sue Bohlin is an associate speaker with Probe Ministries. She attended the University of Illinois, and has been a Bible teacher and conference speaker for over 25 years. She serves as a Mentoring Mom for MOPS (Mothers of Pre-Schoolers), and on the board of Living Hope Ministries, a Christ-centered outreach to those wanting to leave homosexuality. She is also a professional calligrapher and the webservant for Probe Ministries; but most importantly, she is the wife of Dr. Ray Bohlin and the mother of their two college-age sons. She can be reached via e-mail at sue@probe.org.

Thursday, October 4, 2012

FEMINIST THEOLOGY

(Feminism goes with theology as much as witchcraft goes with theology)
by David J. Stewart
“Even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him lord...” —1st Peter 3:6
Introduction
I have over 2,000 books and booklets. People have often commented to me, “I wish I liked to read as much as you do.” Truthfully, I don't like reading, but I certainly DO love learning. To me, reading without learning is a waste of time, but that is just me. I realize that some people like to read just for the sake of reading (and that's just fine, but I don't like to read anything unless I'm going to gain knowledge or wisdom from it). So as you can imagine, I am NOT a fan of fiction books. I read to learn, thus performing the unpleasant task of reading books to fulfill the joy of learning. I very much enjoy books because they contain information. Each book is a reflection of someone's beliefs, attitudes, and soul.  Hence, I'm always on the lookout for more books. 
I like to look around in thrift stores because there are usually lots of books available. Recently while looking around in a Salvation Army thrift store, I noticed a book that caught that my attention... FEMINIST THEOLOGY from the THIRD WORLD by Ursula King (ISBN: 0-88344-963-3; or from the British Library, ISBN: 0-281-04736-7). The book was first printed in the USA in 1994. Throughout the book, the page titles read “Feminist Theology,” which is what I will address the book as hereafter. I have read the book and would like to share with you my Biblical rebuttal of this spiritually misguiding book. 
I had never heard the term “feminist theology” before. To my surprise, I found tons of articles online concerning this diabolical movement. I say “diabolical” because feminists are actually trying to redefine God by perverting the Scriptures. God is NOT made of clay friend, you can't just shape Him into whatever type of god you want. God is the Potter, and we are the clay. Isaiah 64:8, “But now, O LORD, thou art our father; we are the clay, and thou our potter; and we all are the work of thy hand.” We were created in God's image; we CANNOT create God in ours. Tragically, the feminists have recreated their own false god that allows women to rule over men, and a woman to disobey her husband. This wicked twisting of the Bible is known as “feminist theology” and it's straight from Hell.
FEMINIST THEOLOGY by Ursula King is just another one of the Devil's attempts to further the Ecumenical Movement. What is the Ecumenical Movement?  It is simply the yoking together of Christians with heathen religions and organizations, with the end result always being APOSTASY. Ursula King in her book tries to yoke heathen feminism with Biblical Christianity, which is simply impossible. You can say 2 + 2 = 5 if you want to, but the truth is intolerant... 2 + 2 will always equal 4. According to the book cover, Ursula King is Professor of Theology and Religious Studies at the University of Bristol, which in my opinion is very sad. She is akin to Kittredge Cherry, another whacko religious college professor, who is relentlessly working to make abortion a religious sacrament in the Church. What a bunch of God-haters!
Let me also say before I begin that I mean no unkindness to Professor King or anyone, especially not to women. I believe in equality as much as anyone, but WITHIN the teachings of the Word of God. The type of equality which Ms. King promotes is in fact REBELLION against God's Word. BIBLICAL SUBMISSION is a teaching nowhere found in Professor King's feminist book. I triple-dog dare you to find any guidance from Ms. King's book encouraging a wife to OBEY her husband, you cannot. 
1st Timothy 5:14-15 teaches that women belong at home, married with children, and staying out of trouble. The Communist U.S. government today is under the control of evil people who want to break apart the family. Women in struggling marriages are encouraging to leave the home, hire a free government lawyer, stab the husband in the back by filing for divorce, and the lawyers and judge cut his throat from there. Filing for divorce is the most evil thing a wife can do to her husband. God hates divorce (Jeremiah 3:20).
It is sadly apparent that Ursula King is a wicked feminist hiding behind the cloak of religion and the Bible. This will become more obvious to you as I present some of her numerous feminist quotes. Throughout her book, you will find words such as “Liberation” and “empowerment” concerning women. King's “feminist theology” is in her own words... a “liberation theology.” The only liberation that Christians have a Biblical right to claim is in Jesus Christ. 2nd Corinthians 3:17: “Now the Lord is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.” Amen! Whereas we were once in bondage to the curse of the Law against sin; we are now as born-again Christians liberated through the precious physical blood of Jesus Christ. Ephesians 2:13, “But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made NIGH BY THE BLOOD OF CHRIST.” What a wonderful God and Savior!!!
That is the only “liberation” that women ought to be talking about as Christians; not the Satanic rebellious liberation that evil women want from any type of masculine authority over them. I am not hesitant to tell you that God is a MASCULINE God. The Bible is a MASCULINE Book. God gave authority in the home to the MAN. God gave authority in the Church to the MEN. Women are to remain silent in the Church. 1st Timothy, “But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.” Feminism is rebellion against God in every way. Feminism is the cause of so many divorces today. Feminism is the cause of so many church splits.
Feminism is the reason why nationwide, police departments have become so corrupt and abusive. God never intended for women to wear uniforms, lift weights, and perform masculine jobs. Masculine women are angry women. They've turned America into the laughingstock nation of the world. Notice as women increasingly gain positions of authority in America that our nation is becoming worse, and worse and worse. And to no surprise, homosexuals are gaining positions of authority at the same pace. Feminism, rebellion, fornication, abortion, homosexuality all go together. It is sad that so many U.S. judges are now lesbians. How much more of this wickedness will God tolerate before He says ENOUGH!!!
"Feminist Theology" is a misnomer. Though the term may sound impressive, feminism goes with theology (the study of God) as much as witchcraft would go with theology. Of course, witchcraft is rebellion against God, so any such phrase as "Witchcraft Theology" would be totally contradictory and absurd. As with all the beliefs and efforts of the feminists, they are by nature a contradictory bunch. 
Women cannot rebel against their God-given purpose in life (being a helpmeet to their husband) and still remain happy. Nothing is happy in life until it fulfills the purpose for which it was created. Like it or not, God created the woman for the man (Genesis, 2:18, "And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him"). There is NOTHING demeaning or second class about a wife living for her husband, thus obeying the Scriptures). "Feminist Theology" is just as wicked as "Harry Potter," which is nothing less than witchcraft repackaged. 
It is NOT surprising to me in this generation of apostasy that such a book would be written. The New Oxford Annotated Bible recently came out just for homosexuals, twisting the Word of God around to condone being homosexual. An ordained lesbian minister was recently called to pastor a church in Tennessee. 
Even witches are now being ordained into the ministry. Homosexuals are being ordained. Christianity Today shamefully and wickedly endorses Harry Potter's witchcraft, rather than condemning it. America's religious leaders praised Pope John Paul II (a heretic) when he died. Here's a Gay Baptist Church. Oh the apostasy! 
The world is turning away from God quickly. Ask the average person today if they believe in hell and they'll say, "no... life is hell." What has the world come to when professed "Christian" professors teaching in religious universities are promoting feminism? It is apostasy and wickedness.
Let me make clear that feminism is evil. 
 

Twisting the Bible Around
Part III of Professor King's book is titled "The Bible as a Source of Empowerment for Women." In Chapter 19 of this section, Professor King states...
"In Corinthians there are clear passages that suppress women and, although we can understand the reasons and the context in which they were written, the question we raise is: Why are these passages emphasized in the Church?  Why is there stress on Genesis 2, where Eve is created from Adam's rib, rather than on the Genesis 1 version of creation, "God created humanity in his own image; male and female he created them"?  Why do we concentrate on oppressive passages in the epistles rather than on the liberative example of Jesus in the Gospels?  One of the particular problems in our community is the literal and legalistic way in which Scripture is understood and the unwillingness to see the spirit of the Scriptures rather than the letter of the law." (Page 211, underline mine)
You have just read the words of a rebellious feminist... NOT of a God-fearing Christian woman. Just as Eve magnified her restrictions, so does Ms. King question the Word of God. God never told Eve not to "touch" the fruit, only not to eat it (Genesis 3:3, "But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die."  Eve magnified her restrictions, just as ALL feminists do! God is the Divine Lawmaker, not mankind. 
Just the fact that Ms. King would refer to ANY portion of the Word of God as... "clear passages that suppress women" is clear indication that she is a militant feminist. There is nothing even remotely Christian about feminism, just as there is no such thing as "Christian adultery" or "Christian homosexuality". 
Professor King spends much of her book focusing upon the suffering and oppression of women in third world nations, and to a lesser extent here at home in the USA. Though I certainly AGREE with the fact that women are being enslaved, sold, manipulated, and abused worldwide... the evils of tyranny, greed, and corrupt governments are infinitely more to blame than masculine theology. 
Ms. King twists the Bible around to fit her agenda of feminism, totally IGNORING the plain and direct teachings of Scriptures. While I understand the argumentative point which Professor King made in her statement above, it surely does NOT give anyone the excuse to diminish the importance of those Scriptures which King refers to as suppressive against women.
Truthfully, we are to obey ALL the Bible. Evidently Ms. King fails to realize that there is nothing inferior about submitting to a higher authority. Even Jesus Himself (Who Philippians 2:6 declares is EQUAL with God) said that His Father was greater than Himself (John 14:28). We read in Philippians 2:8, "And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross"). 
If it wasn't demeaning for Jesus Christ Himself to humble before the Father (with Whom He was EQUAL), then why should any wife have a problem with submitting to her husband with whom she is also EQUAL. Kindly said, Professor King is misguided concerning the truth of God's Word. Women are in no way inferior.
Here are some further statements by Professor Ursula King:
  • "Most people recognize that women are insecure, but we need to recognize the fact that men are insecure also." (Page 211)
  • "Much of the language that we use in church liturgies and documents exclude women." (Page 212)
  • "The symbols used emphasize the maleness of God, ignoring the female aspects." (Page 212)
It is apparent in my opinion that Ms. King has much animosity towards men in general (typical of feminists). Feminism is NOT about women's rights as much as it is about women REBELLING against the Biblical teachings that a woman is to obey her husband and to keep quiet when around men in the church.
 

Give Us "Equality"
"I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High." -Isaiah 14:14
In chapter 30, Challenging Traditional Theological Thinking, Professor King states...
"Liberation theology properly understood and implemented does not ignore feminism, nor does it isolate it, but it enables the integration of feminist concerns as part of the political and cultural struggle for liberation." (Page 293)
Though the above statement may sound noble, it certainly is not. The subtle suggestion of the above statement is that church leaders worldwide should sit down and sincerely listen to the complaints and demands of the feminists, but the obvious implication is clearly that the feminists want EMPOWERMENT. This is clearly revealed by King's title chapter... "The Bible as a Source of Empowerment for Women". 
"What feminist liberation theologians are DEMANDING..." (Page 294, emphasis mine)
Demanding?
"This is at the heart of feminist liberation theology.  It is not about the ascendancy of women over men, but a movement toward EQUALITY in grace, in which men and women are finally reconciled in a renewed humanity." (Page 296, emphasis mine)
Equality? 
I recall Satan back in Isaiah 14:14 wanted equality with God... "I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High." Satan didn't want to overthrow God, he just wanted to be "like" God (equal to God). Satan didn't try to deceive Eve that she would be greater than God; rather, he told Eve that she and Adam would be "as gods" (Genesis 3:5, "For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods..."). Oh how foolish are the women who buy into the devil's lie of feminism. 
Feminism is that voice of the serpent in the Garden of Eden asking, "Hath God said?"... thus questioning the AUTHORITY of God's Word. The feminists are an foolish bunch, questioning the Word of God.  Please don't commit the same foolish sin as Eve when she disobeyed God. Feminism is all about disobedience. Ursula King's book tries to discredit the Biblical teaching of wifely submission on the premise of womanly oppressions in third world nations. In so doing, King is comparing apples with oranges. You can't blame the Bible for the wickednesses of mankind.
What are those "suppressing" Scriptures in the epistles which King speaks of? Interestingly she doesn't name any. It's obvious to anyone who is knowledgeable about the Bible which one's they are...
"Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law." -1st Corinthians 14:34
How about Ephesians 5:22...
"Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord."
1st Peter 3:1...
 "Likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands..."
1st Timothy 2:12...
"But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence."
It is clear from these Bible passages (and umpteen more) that a wife is commanded by God to submit to her own husband. It is also clear that women are not to have AUTHORITY over men, but to keep quiet. This is not "suppression" Ms. King, this is the obedient faith which is pleasing to the Lord. Ms. King's book rambles on with tons of dialog, and she beats around the bush much of the time, but it is abundantly clear that she is indeed a staunch feminist who does NOT accept the Biblical teaching of womanly submission at home or in the church.
 

Misapplying the Gospel
Ursula King states on page 296...
"Liberation in all forms is at the core of the Christian Gospel."
The above statement is VERY deceiving because what may seem for some to be liberation from rules and restrictions (remember Eve) may in reality be rebellion and sin. A rebellious teenager who disobeys his or her parents with the reasoning that they want to be "free" may instead end up dead from a drug-overdoes or unknowingly raped at wild party while under the influence of the drug Ecstasy. Where is their freedom, inside the rules or outside? A little Chihuahua dog lives inside a fenced yard. He barks aggressively at a ferocious Pit Bull killer walking by. 
The little dog wants out and tries to find a way to escape but he cannot. The little dog thinks that there's freedom outside the fence. But the reality is that the little dog is infinitely safer INSIDE the restricted area. Likewise, feminist women want out, they don't want to be told what to do. Just as the little dog didn't know what was good for him, likewise feminist women know what's best for them. The end result of feminism is lesbianism. I once heard a young woman say, "I'm never going to get married, I'm not going to wait on any man hand and foot." 
To no surprise, she became a lesbian, a very miserable and frustrated lesbian. As she grew older, the sad reality set in that she had no children, she started gaining much weight, smoking and drinking alcohol... her life was ruined. Where were her home wrecking Jezebel feminist friends then? That's right, nowhere to be found.
Yes, the Gospel is at the core of all TRUE forms of liberation, but feminism is certainly NOT one of them. Feminism enslaves!  Do you know why America is going to hell in every way? Here's a statement from the great sermon, PAYDAY SOMEDAY, by Dr. R.G. Lee...
"The spiritual life of a nation, city, town, school, church, or home never rises any higher than the spiritual life of women."
—Dr. R.G. Lee (Payday Someday)
It's that simple folks! Women are the wives of today and the mothers of tomorrow. Feminism is destroying America.  Increasingly, women are steering away from being mothers and wives, opting for careers instead. Please don't allow feminism to rob you of being a submissive wife and a godly mother. Please don't allow feminism to murder your baby through abortion. Feminism has duped America's women into murdering their own little babies in the name of "liberation."
Please read the truth about Gloria Steinem
Also, The Young Lady is a Tramp
American Communism and Feminism
The "liberation" which Ursula King is promoting is rebellion against God. Dr. King's entire book attacks the Bible, what she calls "traditional theological thinking." The term "theological thinking" implies that the historical doctrines of the Christian faith came by the will of men and not by God. The Bible counters such allegations with the following truth...
"For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost." -2nd Peter 1:21
The 1611 King James Bible is the Word of God. We received the Bible from the Holy Spirit, not from "theological thinkers" as King would lead people to believe. You see, if you fall into the deceitful thinking of King that Christianity is "changeable," then you will be driven about by every wind of doctrine. 
The Word of God CANNOT be changed (Matthew 5:18). God CANNOT be changed (Malachi 3:6). Though wifely obedience may appear only to be an "old-fashioned" tradition, it is so much more...it is obedience to the Word of God!
Again, the "liberation" which King claims is the core of the Christian Gospel does NOT include a liberation from obeying the plain and direct teachings of the Word of God. God said what He meant and meant what He said!
 
Male and Female
Let me ask you a question..."Is God a male chauvinist?" After all, did not God make the husband the head of the wife (Ephesians 5:23)? Did not Paul asked women to silence themselves in church (2nd Timothy 2:12)? Did God make only males in His image, and then as an after thought make woman (as Archie Bunker suggested) a cheaper cut?
Helen Reddy became so incensed at this attitude that, upon acceptance of the Grammy Award for her record, she proclaimed "I am Woman, I thank God because She made it all possible." That shocked most people in the 1970s, but in 2002, with the advent of a gender-neutral Bible, it does not seem so farfetched anymore.
To set the record straight on what God Almighty had in mind about man and woman, we need to go back to Genesis 1:26, where God says, "Let Us make man [humankind or human beings—not as Archie Bunker thought, only men or males] in Our image, according to Our likeness." Both male and female together are created in the image of God. There is no need to rewrite the Bible to satisfy the sinful agendas and DEMANDS of the feminists. Please read, Is the Bible sexist?
 
The Feminists "female" God is NOT Immutable
(Trying to turn God into a female)
King states on page 256...
"God as mother and woman challenges the old concept that emphasized, along with other attributes, God as immutable and unchangeable. Woman's body grows and changes radically through menstruation and pregnancy compared to the male body. God as mother is more approachable and personable."
Professor King is redefining God, changing the truth into a lie... "Who changed the truth of God into a lie..." (Romans 1:25). We were created in God's image, it is dangerous to try to recreate God in our own image. Whether the feminists like it or not, God has presented Himself to mankind in the masculine gender. The Devil is using this damnable heresy that Dr. King and others (such as the Wiccan witches) are promoting about the female side of God. Now Satan has even published new perverted Bibles promoting this heresy. Nearly every demonic cult throughout history has recognized a female goddess, or feminine side of God. Here's some information on recent Bible corruptions:
  • TNIV: Translation Treason  (According to Hebrews 2:17 in the TNIV, Jesus was made like a woman in every way!  Should it be surprising that Harper Collins [parent company of Zondervan which publishes the NIV and TNIV] should also publish the filth, "Making Out, The Book of Lesbian Sex and Sexuality"?  I think not!  The devil is in the NIV and TNIV folks!  Get ready for the homosexual "gay" bible, it is coming!  By the way, Avon publishers [another subsidiary of Harper Collins] publishes the Satanic Bible!)
  • Does the World Really Need a Gender-Neutral Bible? (A gay Bible is on the way!)
  • NIV 2011... the Feminist's Lesbian Bible!
King says...
"God as mother and woman challenges the old concept that emphasized, along with other attributes, God as immutable and unchangeable."
Why would you want to "challenge" the Word of God Ms. King? Also, did I read you right? Did you call the Biblical proclamation of the immutability of God a "concept"? "Immutability" means "the inability to change." Thus, God is a Holy God, a God of moral perfection... nothing will ever change that! God's perfect character and goodness CANNOT be compromised. God cannot break a promise (Titus 1:2). Malachi 3:6 declares, "For I am the LORD, I change not..." 
How can you just disregard the Bible and "challenge" God's immutability Ms. King? Professor King has opened up a Pandora's box with her numerous heretical teachings, which are not based upon sound Biblical doctrine; but rather upon the frustrations and wild conjectures of an unsaved feminist. Sadly, there is a growing army of such apostate-minded individuals. Ursula King is NO Christian!
In fact, professor King is aligned with the atheists. The following quote was taken from the atheist website: http://atheism.about.com/od/whatisgod/a/gender.htm
"...continued references to God as male are simply part of a larger situation in which religion serves to perpetuate stereotypes about and discrimination against women. Arguably, gender-neutral language about God would serve to reduce the prevalence of both stereotypes and discrimination, goals which should be important for religious organizations."
There is an ongoing Satanic attack against the Word of God...with hordes of feminists, atheists, witches, homosexuals, adulterers, God-haters, and even many professed Christians trying to twist the Bible into whatever they desire it to be.  Fortunately, the TRUTH cannot be changed!  The Word of God CANNOT be altered.  God's Word will prevail.
Ms. King says on page 295...
"Women (and men) are learning to study the Scriptures with love, thoroughness, and expectancy, and are now being open to the revelation of hidden meanings and meanings glossed over in relation to understanding women's place in the traditional faith."
HIDDEN MEANINGS?
Hmmm.  You mean after all these hundreds of years, Christians are just now starting to find "NEW" doctrines that weren't visible before?  "New meanings" means "new teachings" (and teachings are doctrines).  I've never heard anything so indicative of the apostate condition of religion today.  Folks, the woman who wrote this book is a "professor" in a religious university. 
Let me share with you some of King's "hidden meanings"...
On page 244, Chapter 24 begins, titled, The Concept of God and the Spirit from the Feminist Perspective.
Somewhere along the line, it was apparently decreed that the Trinity should be all male.  Hence the adoration of the Virgin Mary as "daughter of the Father, mother of Jesus, spouse of the Holy Spirit."  A perfect example of the way some men would like to see women" always as daughter/mother/spouse, never as a human being in her own right.
"Somewhere along the way?" How about forever Ms. King, because that's how long the Godhead has been in existence for all eternity (John 1:1-3,14; Hebrews 13:8). The Bible presents the Godhead as masculine, like it or not. There never was a time when there was no God, and there never will be. The whole concept of feminist theology is Biblically flawed. You simply cannot feminize God to pacify the wickedness of a generation of feminists. The Bible presents God in a masculine image... case closed. Please read, Is God Male or Female?
Furthermore, Ursula King's above comment concerning women being daughters, mothers, and spouses clearly reveals her CONTEMPT for such God-ordained feminine roles. Let me set you straight "Professor" King... THERE IS NO GREATER ROLE IN THE WORLD THAN THAT OF A MOTHER! If you're a mother reading this article, don't you dare let some feminist rebel like Ursula King shake your confidence in being a mother. Being a mother is infinitely greater than being a professor, career woman, or even President of the United States. The future literally rests and depends upon mothers. 
There is nothing degrading about being "just" a mother. On the contrary, I think it is tragic for a woman to forfeit motherhood to pacify the foolish career seeking agendas of the feminists. God intended for women to be a helpmeet for their husband, not sit behind a desk and analyze statistics. I am not saying that it is wrong for a woman to work outside the home IF her husband agrees to it. I am saying that to do so is a big step downward from being a mother at home raising her children for the Lord (1st Timothy 5:14-15).
 

Abuse Does NOT Permit Feminism
Here's a quote from the following webpage... http://www.wfu.edu/~matthetl/perspectives/twentyeight.html:
"Many lay-people see the ordination of women as a denial of the authority of Scripture, as an abandonment of the Bible. As such, it opens the door to a moral and religious relativism. One woman seminarian at Duke was assigned a field education appointment where the church elected to house her in a farm shed that had been formerly used for keeping animals. Her experience suggests just how much further Feminism must go, and just how much it is needed."
The author of the above quote is trying to justify rebellion against God's Word on the premise of alleged cases of mistreatment of women. Just because some church members may or may not have made a wise decision does NOT give anyone the right to discredit the Bible. 
Surely, nowhere in the Bible do we find an allowance for degrading women. Abuse and mistreatment of women is wrong, but redefining the Word of God to give women "empowerment" and" liberation" against the plain teachings of the Bible is even worse. "Feminist theology" is more than just theology from a female's point of view; rather, feminist theology is a twisting around of the Bible to nullify all Scriptures which "suppress" a woman's desire for authority. Let me make clear this point: Feminism is NOT about equality of "rights" as much as it is about equality of "authority."
Feminists want AUTHORITY!!! Please notice that I didn't say "power." Women already have much power, but it's the power of "influence" and NOT the power of "authority." Eve didn't like being restricted, she wanted to have the authority to do as she pleased. Though she didn't have the power of "authority", she certainly did have the power of "influence" and she influenced Adam to do wrong. Feminists want authority in the church over men (to tell men what to do) and they want authority in the home over the husband (to tell the husband what to do), but the Word of God teaches that it is wrong for a woman to usurp authority over a man (1st Timothy 2:12). 
It is wrong for a woman to have dominion over a man. The feminists hate this kind of "traditional theological thinking," but it is solid Bible. If you are a feminist, then at least be honest enough to admit it; but don't hide like some coward behind such nonsensical inventions of the Devil as "feminist theology" because there simply is NO such animal.
Ursula King in her book tries to yoke godless feminism with Biblical Christianity, which is simply impossible. You can say 2 + 2 = 5 if you want to, but the truth is intolerant... 2 + 2 will always equal 4.
END

Unholy Hands On the Bible
The NIV 2011 has removed the masculinity of the Holy Spirit. Here is John 14:26 from the perverted NIV 2011...

John 14:26 (New International Version, ©2010)

26 But the Advocate, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have said to you.
Now here is what the inspired and trustworthy King James Bible says...
John 14:26, “But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.”
That masculine pronoun “he” is critically important, plainly evidencing that there is NO female aspect of the GODHEAD. Lest you should fail to see the importance of this matter, consider that feminists have concocted their own New Age theology called, yep you guessed it... FEMINIST THEOLOGY! (as you've read in the preceding article). Feminist Theology teaches that the Holy Spirit is the feminine aspect of the Godhead; whereas the Bible only teaches a masculine God.

Jeremiah 3:20, “Surely as a wife treacherously departeth from her husband...”

  Feminist Fantasies

No assault has been more ferocious than feminism’s forty-year war against women. And no battlefield leader has been more courageous than Phyllis Schlafly. In these dispatches from the front, feminism’s most potent foe exposes the delusions and hypocrisy behind a movement that has cheated millions of women out of their happiness, health, and security.


 
  The Church Impotent
The Feminization of Christianity

The current preoccupation with the role of women in the church obscures the more serious problem of the perennial absence of men. This provocative book argues that Western churches have become "women's clubs," that the emasculation of Christianity is dangerous for the church and society, and that a masculine presence can and must be restored...the only book to confront the lopsidedly feminine cast of modern Christianity with a profound analysis of its historical and sociological roots.  
 


 
  7 Myths of Working Mothers
Why Children and (Most) Careers Just Don't Mix

Dispelling our most cherished myths
about working mothers, Suzanne Venker argues that women can never be successful in the workplace and at home simultaneously. Women can achieve the balance they so desperately seek only by planning their careers around motherhood, rather than planning motherhood around their careers.