Now the task of hermeneutics is to realize, first of all, that there
is a God given meaning in Scripture, apart from you or me or anybody
else. Scripture means something if means nothing to me, understood? It
means something if it means nothing to you. It means something if it
means nothing to anybody. It means something in itself, and that
meaning is determined by God, the Author, not by one who is going
through some kind of mystical experience.
The interpreter’s task then is to discern that meaning. To discover
the meaning of the text in its proper setting, to draw the meaning out
of the Scripture, rather than to read one’s meaning into it. The
importance of careful, Biblical interpretation can hardly be overstated.
We spend three or four years at the master seminary trying to teach
men how to do this because it is the heart and soul of effective
ministry. In fact, I would go so far as to say misinterpreting the
Bible is ultimately no better than disbelieving it. So what do you mean
by that? Well, what good does it do to believe that the Bible is God’s
final and complete word if you misinterpret it? Either way you miss the
truth, right? It is equally serious along with disbelieving the Bible
to misinterpret it. Interpreting Scripture to make it say what it was
never intended to say is a sure road to division, to error, to heresy
and to apostasy. In spite of all of the dangers of misinterpreting the
Scripture, today we have these casual people who approach the Scripture
whimsically without any understanding of the science of interpretation
and make it say whatever they would like it to say.
Perhaps you’ve been in one those Bible studies where you go around
the room and everybody tells you what they think the verse means? Or
worse than that, “Well, to me this verse means,” so-and-so. In the end,
what you get is a pooling of ignorance, unless somebody knows what it
means apart from them. The truth is it doesn’t matter what a verse
means to me, it doesn’t matter what it means to you, it doesn’t matter
what it means to anybody else, it doesn’t matter if it means anything to
anybody else. All that matters is what does it mean? What did God
intend to say? Every verse has intrinsic meaning apart from any of us
and the task of Bible study is to discern the true meaning of
Scripture. That’s why I can come to you week after week, month after
month, year after year and explain to you the meaning of the Word of
God, apart from any personal experience I’m having. That’s irrelevant.
The task of the interpreter is to discern the meaning of Scripture. In 2 Timothy 2:15
it says, “Be diligent,” or study, “present yourself approved to God as a
workman who doesn’t need to be ashamed because he’s handling accurately
the Word of Truth.” If you don’t handle it accurately, you oughta be
ashamed of yourself. And if you’re gonna handle it accurately, you have
to be diligent, you have to work hard at it. Clearly handling
Scripture involves both of those things, hard work and diligence. It
must be interpreted accurately, and those who fail to do that have
reason to be ashamed…
God has not hidden His truth from us, but its meaning is not always instantly clear. It demands hard work. That’s why in 1 Timothy 5:17
it says that, “Those elders who labor in the Word and doctrine are
worth of double honor,” because it’s hard work. That’s why God has
given teachers to the church so that we can work hard and understanding
God’s Word correctly, instructing people in the Scriptures through
persistent, conscientious labor in the Word.
Now, today we have, frankly, a lack of respect for the work of gifted
theologians, a lack of respect for the hard work of gifted expositors
who have spent years studying and interpreting Scripture. In fact, that
lack of respect tends to be somewhat charismatically characteristic.
They tend to sort of look at all of us that way. I think I read you of
the letter from the lady who said, “Your problem is you’re too much into
the Bible. Throw away your Bible,” remember that, “and stop
studying.” You see, Charismatics place more emphasis on letting people
in the congregation say whatever they think Jesus is telling them the
verse means, and to listen to what one writer calls, “Airy fairy
theologians.” There’s a vast difference, by the way, between the
whimsical kitchen table interpretations of laymen, the teaching of
skilled men who work very hard to rightly divide the Word.
I heard a radio interview with a Charismatic woman pastor. She was
asked how she got her sermons up? She replied, “I don’t get ‘em up, I
get ‘em down. God delivers them to me.” That’s an all too familiar
thing. I can promise you that God has never delivered one to me. I
haven’t gotten them down. I’ve had to ‘em up. Some people even believe
it’s unspiritual to study. After all, some say, taking another verse
out of context, didn’t Jesus say, “For the Holy Spirit will teach you
and that very hour what you want to say,” so you just go into the pulpit
and whatever comes into your mind, you say? And that’s why they invent
their theology as they speak because they have no idea what’s going to
be said until they hear it. We should be greatly concerned about this
ad lib approach. You never ever make a point true or false at the price
of a proper interpretation. Otherwise, you are the final authority and
not the Word of God.
Secondly, don’t spiritualize or allegorize the text. Some people
think the Bible is a fable to teach whatever you wanna get across. A
myriad of illustrations of this. I remember back when Jerry Mitchell
was on our staff and a young couple came into him for counseling,
marriage counseling. He began to talk with them and after about 30
minutes, he said he’d been married only six months and you’re already on
the edge of a divorce? Why did you ever get married? You’re miles
apart. “Oh,” said the husband, “it was a sermon the pastor preached in
our church.” “What was the sermon?” “Well, he preached on the walls of
Jericho.” “Jericho? What does that have to do with marriage?”
“Well,” he said, “God’s people claimed the city marched around it seven
times and the walls fell down.” And he said, “If a young man believed
God had given him a certain girl, he could claim her, march around her
seven times and the walls of her hear would fall down. That’s what I
did and we got married.” “That can’t be true,” he said. “You’re
kidding, aren’t you?” I remember him sayin’ that. “You gotta be
kidding.” “No, it’s true. And there were many other couples that got
married because of the same sermon.” Some people believe their
marriages were made in Heaven. That was made in an allegory and a bad
one at that. That’s the kind of interpretation that has gone on since
the early days of the church, continues today, especially in the
Charismatic movement.
Remember listening to a series on the book of Nehemiah. The whole
purpose of the book of Nehemiah by this Charismatic preacher was to
teach Charismatic doctrine. Jerusalem’s walls were in ruin and that was
representative of the broken down walls of human personality. Nehemiah
was the Holy Spirit, the king’s pool was the baptism of the Holy Spirit
and the mortar between the bricks was tongues. And what Nehemiah’s
teaching is the Holy Spirit wants to come rebuild your broken walls
through the baptism of the Holy Spirit and speaking in tongues. I had
an opportunity to talk to that preacher about that and we had an
interesting conversation. I tried to show him that that was nothing but
the invention of his own imagination, read from the New Testament back
into the Old, but never the intention of Nehemiah, to which he agreed.
That kind of preaching is a form of hucksterism, and as I said, “You may
come up with the truth that you teach, but if you spiritualize the text
to do it, then you legitimize spiritualization of any text which leaves
you with any fanciful conclusion.”
Well, the correct approach you probably need to go to Jesus and
remember that when He was walking on the road to Emmaus, He said, Luke
did, the beginning with Moses and with all the prophets, He explained to
them the things concerning Himself in the Scriptures. The Word
explained is hermeneual from which we get hermeneutics. He carefully
interpreted the Old Testament. He used hermeneutics. He’s a model of a
teacher, used sound interpretive methods.
So, when we teach the Word of God, when we come to the conclusions
that we come to, we wanna be certain that we don’t make severe errors,
one, by making points at the price of proper interpretation, two, by
somehow concocting or spiritualizing something that isn’t there, and
three, and I’ve already talked about this, by superficial study.
Superficial study is equally disastrous. But I’ve said enough about
that not to have to say more. (Online source)
No comments:
Post a Comment